Reaffirms the Prohibition on Non-Kuwaitis Conducting Commercial Activities in Kuwait Without a Kuwaiti Partner Holding at Least 51% of the Capital
The Commercial Circuit No. 16 of the Court of Appeal Reaffirms the Prohibition on Non-Kuwaitis Conducting Commercial Activities in Kuwait Without a Kuwaiti Partner Holding at Least 51% of the Capital
In a case brought by Meshari Al-Osaimi Law Firm and Legal Consultations, the Commercial Circuit No. 16 of the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and upheld the judgment under appeal, ordering a contracting company to pay an expatriate contractor his outstanding financial dues arising from subcontracting works performed in relation to a construction project.
The claim was founded
on the principles of equivalent performance and unjust enrichment,
following the absolute nullity of the subcontracting agreement for contravening
public order. The court held that the agreement was void for violating the
prohibition set out under Article 23 of the Kuwaiti Commercial Law No. 68 of
1980, which restricts non-Kuwaitis from performing commercial activities in Kuwait
unless they act through a Kuwaiti partner or partners holding no less than 51%
of the total capital of the firm.
The court further affirmed that contracting activities fall within the scope of
commercial activities.
Although the
underlying agreement was deemed void, the court nevertheless held that the
contracting company could not retain the benefit of the works performed without
paying the corresponding value. Accordingly, the court ruled the company pay the client the amount
due based on unjust enrichment and as an equivalent performance
for the benefit it had received.
This judgment is
significant as it reaffirms two important legal principles: first, that
non-Kuwaitis may not personally conduct contracting or other commercial
activities in Kuwait in breach of the statutory ownership requirements; and
second, that the invalidity of a contract does not permit one party to unjustly
benefit from works performed by another without compensation.
The defense team in this case was led by Partner
Attorney Mr. Hassan Al-Mousawi, together with Legal Consultant Mr.
Al-Tayeb Ali and Attorney Mr. Ali Al-Mutairi.
In light of this
judgment, non-Kuwaiti contractors are advised to avoid entering into
contracting agreements in their personal capacity, as such agreements may be
deemed void. Contracting arrangements should instead be executed through a duly
licensed company in which Kuwaiti ownership represents at least 51% of the
capital, in compliance with Kuwaiti law.
Practical
Guidance to Avoid Similar Disputes in Kuwait
- Document the contractual relationship in writing
before commencing work
The agreement should clearly define the nature of the arrangement, whether it is based on a lump-sum price or measured quantities, together with the scope of works, payment mechanism, and supporting documents required to prove completion. - Verify the legal capacity of the contracting
party
Before assigning contracting works, parties should ensure that the contractor or service provider holds the proper license and legal capacity to conduct commercial or contracting activities in Kuwait. - Avoid relying on verbal arrangements or
undocumented payments
Parties should retain work orders, quantity surveys, invoices, payment vouchers, correspondence, and handover records, as such documents may become decisive evidence in the event of a dispute.